Intergalactic police force needed says US ethicist
|
US ethicist Patrick Lin, of the The Nanoethics Group in Santa Barbara, believes that we will need an intergalactic police force to keep order in space and protect the interests of the vulnerable.
Commercial space travel is becoming a reality, says Lin, and the public needs confidence that governments, scientists and astronauts are considering the consequences of exploring space. For instance, we need a fair process for commercialising or claiming property in space to avoid the kind of "chaotic land-grab" that occurred with internet domain names. There are legal disputes already. Despite UN treaties declaring space as commonly-owned, he says lawsuits have been filed to lay claim to asteroids. Lin says it is important to have a justifiable reason for exploring space. "Are reasons such as for adventure, wanderlust or 'backing up the biosphere' good enough to justify our exploration of space?" Lin says issues such as polluting space, the proliferation of military technologies in space and the safety of space travellers should also be considered. "Have we learned enough about ourselves and our history to avoid the same mistakes as we have made on Earth?" Finally, some critics suggest it may be better to spend money on alleviating poverty and hunger, providing access to clean and affordable water and energy, and addressing other issues including human rights violations. |


The man is right, we don't yet understand the ethical implications of slamming two rocks together ! Let's head back to the caves! /sarcasm
So many angles on this:
-is there any international legal system in place now that empowers the common good rather than the intrests of corporations? Righto.
-can we really trust governments to spend the money saved on alleviating hunger, making world peace, curing cancer... etc. etc. ? Thought not.
-is it the daredevil pioneers that polluted our planet, or the regulated and legal mass production systems that actually forced pioneers to break the boundaries in the first place?
I think Paul Davies sums it up best at the end of the article:
"Let's stop sport and spend that money on alleviating poverty in Africa," he says. "You never hear that argument."
How about this: You can have all the land you can occupy in space. If you can land on an asteroid and live there, it's yours, or at least the bit you live on is.
Commercial space travel is advancing, but it's not that advanced.