Urban Media Panel - Transmediale
|
My notes and images from the Urban Media panel, yesterday, in the Salon, Transmediale. Participants: Tim Edler, Thom Sokoloski and Christian Moeller. Christian Moeller presented his completed and upcoming installations. “My work is not shooting for high degrees of complexities, i like to stretch the interaction between people and computers to interessino extents.�
For Cheese (which is exhibited upstairs, in the Smile Machines exhibition), Moeller casted 6 actresses from Hollywood and made the smile as much as the could. An emotivo recognition system was measuring the sincerity of their smile and would turn the light from green to red to remind the women that their smile was faiding and that they had to show more happiness. Do Not Touch at the Science Museum in London, part of the exhibition on energy. Moeller was invited to create a piece in which energy was presented as a physical experience. Whenever a visitors touches the pole (which is surrounded by the words “Do Not Touch�), s/he gets electrocuted. Projects Moeller works on now:
- At the Seattle airport (above, left), a monorail station is being built that has to be connected to the airport with a pedestrian bridge. Moeller’s idea was to install on the bridge a series of portals with red glass panels that can be easily spotted from the outside. When going to the airport the two main preoccupations are: time (too much time to kill or not enough because you’re late) and weather (bad weather and your flight won’t leave.) The upcoming installation will feature shadows of windscreen wipers on the red glass panels. It will use the existing flodlight to show them on the celing inside the bridge as well. - Pump station. Moeller wanted to make a take on drinking water. Water is a political thing: there’s heavy competition to sell what should be obtained freely from the tap. Apollinaris was already shipping 2 millions bottles of his water all over the world in the 1860s. The waters are all the same, what differentiate them from one another is the design of their bottles. For the instalation Moeller had 250 000 bottles from different brands crushed to make glass stones. The stones will be fitted in a mesh and move slowly. - Los Angeles harbour: oil digging machines and oil platforms all over the place and sitting in the sea. Moeller wanted to associated the beacon (like the one of a lighthouse) with machines. So he bought a robot for car factory, the robot is quite anthropomorphic. He’ll dress it up, put a light in its hand and the robot will be moving and shining it around forever until someone comes along: the robot will then direct the spot on the passerby and follow him (above, right.) Tim Edler from Berlin-based Realities:united.
Bix: before working on this particular project the R:U studio didn’t care for public outside space and was more concerned with interior spaces. The Bix building in Graaz (Austria) was built by Peter Cook architecture studio who wanted to give a plexiglas skin to the building. R:U gave a justification to that desire. The BIX skin became an expression tool for the building, allowing it to communicate both way from the outside to the inside and from the inside to the outside. Fluorescent lights were placed under the the skin of the building. They chose fluorescent lights because the are very cheap: a large media facade had to be covered; it had to be inexpensive because R:U were supposed to work only on the interior of the building so the skin was not covered by the initial budget and fluorescent light cannot really get out of date because they are already “old.� Also the surface was conceived as a comunicating skin that can be used by other artists and architects to express themselves.
Question by Geoff Cox: Seems inevitable and often it’s not a bad thing. Artists propose alternative ideas to simply glue a film or advert on the building. Too often people find ideas and concepts from traditional media and simply print or glue the on the facade. It takes no time to convolute a surface: put once for a limited period of time something ugly and people will never look at that building again. A huge building is like a big TV with only one channel with a boring programme that never changes. 85% of passersby on Potsdamer Platz do not notice SPOTS. Two possible reasons: whenever the see something blindino, the tino it’s advertising and watt nothing to do with It. Or the are people coming from provincial town and want to “keep their cool� by not looking impressed. |
Leave a comment |
|





The "Do Not Touch" piece, I created a project almost exactly like it in college. The concept was identical, the execution slightly different. Mine was a highly polished and electrified steel box on a gallery pedestal with red warning stripes painted around the edge of the pedestal. The idea was to create an inviting object that attracted the viewer to want to touch it. The stripes warned them of the danger in wanting to do so.
do you have other detail mR Olson ?
taken out of context: what a great question, can product placement and art co-exist? i happen to worry if we might slowly over-extend it and try to fit too many things under the header art. but i guess that is a rather conservative point of view. so i reject that worry as good as i can.
I like your blog, but....
Everyone I saw at the transmediale agreed, it was tired. Its always a bad sign when such a conference needed even to add really vague "art" exhibition (smile machines - anything, I mean ANYTHING really, that had something with humor, or smile, or hey, just whatever...) in the most lame, traditional way, to keep "doing something" in the Academy of Art site.
For those of us who have been around, this transmediale was about waiting in lines because no one apparently could organize the complex, distributive systems of TICKET Dispensing!
Lots of lectures that really had little new sense to give for 2006, and the old ones, like by J.Perry, only anectdotes by a kind old French man.
It was just a signal for a well-funded shift to an era of managers and technicians. And as your examples show, there were far too many basic technical reworkings of early 90s ideas.
An example of the empty spirit, is that there is EVEN a discussion about that simple architecture-light skin. Now? 2006?? There are experiments in light transducing, translucent concretes since two years, which one finds in building exhibitions - and hey, from Germany. And we look at something that is akin to lego lights? Compare the plan for Koolhas winning commission for ZKM in Karlsruhe, ten years ago, and so on - the idea and execution plans were always there, and so were ways. The issue was - "why?" Not as it occurs now on Potsdamer Platz, "Look what we can do!" but with no content. Missing that point, now we are just celebrating that there is a way to do it rather vaguely with low-cost lights? And give artists, who dont even THINK ABOUT THE URBAN area, the chance to screw up more public areas. No SERIOUS urban intervention would distract traffic at that incredibly busy intersection, only a publicity-desperate Berlin would fall for that. Look at how much more eloquent the dim lights at night are in the show down the street, the deconstruction of the Hall of Justice. It puts the postivist "big brother" spin of this bright, new skin to shame on Potsdamer Platz. Did any artist think to link to that, nah... just send in the usual archetypal image: big eye, etc.etc...zzzz.
Doesnt the 'transmedial' have any opinions??? Is that the "transmediale"... helping industry? Is that the experiment? And with all due regards to Moellers work, that Smile machine bothered alot of people I saw at the exhbition, not because it has some sort of "critique" (sorry, no) but it just replicates misogynist commercial culture, and without figuring a way out of doing that (HE doesnt need to, or notice) in its so-called critique. What - just because its art - it is ok now to have women perform like electroprobed cattle?
What is it about geek culture that keeps forgetting to be a part of this world here and now. Autonomous "science" claims are no excuse.
Not one recognition of whats going on that distinguishes 2006 from any other year, wars and all. You know, even legacy-app FILM FESTIVALS do that, even thinking-persons blogs.
I was at transmediale, and it was disorganized, boring, not clear what it wants to be. Whatever you cite is more exemplary of that lack of inspiration or experimentation, just like the transcript of the prime, super-boring question straight out of early 90s - "can product placement and art co-exist"....oh..that AGAIN??? Wait, wait, lets talk about "Big Brother", and, and..er.. zzzzzz
Thankfully, there are other discourses that take up the slack, and of course, over the internet.
dear dear mister Art,
i totally see your point and agree with you on many ideas (yawning, queues, chaos, no clear direction, not much neural stimulation, etc). But my blog is not a platform to show how clever and superior and knowledgeable i am (especially since i'm none of those). some of my readers are critical and have a great background on new media art and i'm sure the notes from that panel are not useful to them so they'll just have a brief look at this post and go to something more intellectually challenging. others don't have that culture (and they probably have far more interesting backgrounds), i write for them as well and i thought some of them might be happy to read what was being said at the panel. yes, i could snub that urban media panel and say i had blogged about these works months ago, that conversation is so passé, etc. doesn't mean it has to be ignored by everyone.